A low appraisal is the most common way a fix and flip deal falls apart after it is already under contract. The purchase is agreed, the rehab is scoped, and then the valuation lands under what the loan was sized on. There are more options at that point than most investors realize.
In short: When an as-is or after-repair valuation comes in below expectations, the loan shrinks because leverage is a percentage of that number. The options are to rebut the appraisal with better comparable sales, order a second opinion with a different capital source, renegotiate the purchase price, bring additional cash, or reduce the rehab scope so the numbers work at the lower value. Because different capital sources use different appraisers and different valuation methods, the same property can support a materially different loan elsewhere.
Usually one of three reasons. The comparable sales used were not truly comparable — wrong condition, wrong sub-market, or stale. The scope of work was not provided or not detailed enough for the appraiser to value the finished product properly. Or the market genuinely does not support the projected value, which is the one case where the appraisal is doing its job and the deal needs rethinking.
A rebuttal works when you can supply better comparable sales that the appraiser did not use, and when you can document why yours are more appropriate. It rarely works as an argument about the conclusion. Provide sales, not opinions: closed transactions, similar condition, similar sub-market, recent. Also confirm the appraiser received a complete scope of work — an ARV appraisal without a detailed scope is guesswork.
Appraisals are ordered by the lender, and different lenders use different appraisal management companies and different valuation approaches. Some accept a broker price opinion in place of a full appraisal on qualifying deals, and some bridge programs waive the appraisal entirely. Moving the file rather than fighting the number is frequently faster and produces a better outcome.
If the value holds, the deal still may. Renegotiating the purchase price with the seller is the cleanest fix. Bringing additional cash works if you have it. Reducing the rehab scope lowers total cost, though it also lowers the ARV, so the arithmetic has to be redone rather than assumed. What does not work is proceeding on the original budget and hoping the resale beats the appraisal.
Pull your own comparables before making an offer and be honest about condition differences. Write the scope of work in detail and give it to the lender at application, not after the appraisal is ordered. And underwrite the deal at a value below your optimistic case, so a modest appraisal variance does not end the project.
You can submit a rebuttal, and it is most effective when it supplies better comparable sales the appraiser did not use, along with documentation of why they are more appropriate. Arguing the conclusion without new sales data rarely changes it.
Often, yes. Lenders use different appraisal management companies and different valuation methods, and some accept a broker price opinion rather than a full appraisal on qualifying deals. The same property can support a meaningfully different loan at another capital source.
Some bridge and fix and flip programs waive a full appraisal on qualifying deals, using a desktop valuation or broker price opinion instead. Availability depends on the property, the leverage requested and the capital source.
That points at the scope of work rather than the property. An appraiser valuing the finished product needs a detailed scope to do it accurately. Providing a complete, specific scope and rebutting with comparable renovated sales is the usual path.
Only if it still works at that number. Rerun the margin with the lower value, the actual rehab budget, and realistic carrying costs. If the answer is thin, the appraisal may have told you something useful about the deal.
2-3 competing quotes from 30+ capital sources. No credit pull. No commitment.
By clicking, you provide express written consent to be contacted by LendingStreet (NMLS #1734316) via SMS, phone, or email, possibly using automated technology, regarding your loan inquiry. Reply STOP to opt out. Consent is not required to obtain services. See our Privacy Policy and Terms.